GNB, Inc. v. UNITED DANCO BATTERIES

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no proof that Defendant made any statement that was “inaccurate or defamatory”
• Altenbernd, J., dissenting in an opinion the majority held to be “entirely correct” with respect to its explanation of the law
• Supreme Court of Florida did not intend to expand the economic loss rule to intentional torts
• function of appellate court is not to reweigh evidence but to view the record to determine if it contains competent and substantial evidence to support conclusions of the trier of fact
• “As an appellate court, it is not our function to reweigh the evidence but, rather, to view the record to determine if it contains competent and substantial evidence to support the conclusions of the trier of fact.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).