Skip to main content
· 11/2/1999

GMAC Mortgage Corp. v. Salisbury (In Re Loloee)

Citations

  • 241 B.R. 655
  • 45 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 880
  • 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9316
  • 99 Daily Journal DAR 11957
  • 1999 Bankr. LEXIS 1423
  • 35 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 60
  • 1999 WL 1067611

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that Rule 7001(2) explicitly requires an adversary proceeding to resolve a lien priority dispute
  • considering the fact that moving papers were “at best, 27 ambiguous” as contributing to lack of notice
  • the greater the deviation from the process set out in the rules, “the greater the quality and amount of notice needed in order to comply with due process”
  • the greater the deviation from the process set out in the rules, “the greater the quality and amount of notice needed in order to comply with due pro- cess”
  • “The procedural requirement in Rule 7001(2) that lien priorities be resolved by adversary proceeding has implications for due process that become important when a Rule 9014 contested matter is asked to do an adversary proceeding’s job.”
  • motion procedure cannot be used to circumvent requirement of adversary proceeding; addressing mail to nobody in particular at corporation does not satisfy requirement of mailing copy to attention of officer or agent authorized to receive service of process

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Klein, Montali, Brandt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.