GMA Accessories, Inc. v. Idea Nuova, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing because claimant had “not even made the conclusory allegation that it lost sales”
• “[B]y its terms Section 38, 15 U.S.C. § 1120, does not apply to trademark applications that have not been registered.”
• “[B]y its terms Section 38, 15 U.S.C. § 1120, does not apply to trademark applications that have not been registered.”
• “Idea Nuova cites no authority for the proposition that § 37 permits a district court to cancel a pending trademark application.”
• “[B]y its terms, § 37 contemplates an action involving a registered trademark.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).