Glynn v. Dubin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “A claim under § 1982 and the FHA both require proof of an intent to discriminate, so the two claims often rise and fall with each other.”
• “A claim under § 1982 and the FHA both require proof of an intent to discriminate, so the two claims often rise and fall with each other.”
• “Notably, their neighbors asked the Watters why ‘you people’ chose to move there, called Mrs. Watters a ‘black bitch’ and a ‘black n-----,’ and called the Watters’ grandchildren ‘little monkey n------.’”
• assessing the prima facie case in an FHA action
• “[R]acial slurs are direct evidence of intentional discrimination.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).