Skip to main content
· 4/22/1994

Glynn v. City of South Portland

Citations

  • 640 A.2d 1065
  • 1994 Me. LEXIS 58

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that when a proposed amended complaint fails to state a claim for relief the trial court properly denied the plaintiffs' motion
  • holding that when a proposed amended complaint fails to state a claim for relief the trial court properly denied the plaintiffs’ motion
  • holding that the court did not abuse its discretion in declining to allow amendment when the amendment would not cure the complaint’s failure to state cognizable claims
  • stating court has discretion to deny motion to amend where the amende would not survive a motion to dismiss
  • trial court may deny motion to amend when amendment would be futile

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wathen, Roberts, Glassman, Collins, Rudman, Dana

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.