Skip to main content
· 10/12/1979

Glynn J. Pelotto v. L & N Towing Company

Citations

  • 604 F.2d 396
  • 1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 11224
  • 1981 A.M.C. 1047

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that res judicata will not bar such subsequent suits
  • treatment that will merely relieve pain and suffering without otherwise improving seaman's physical condition is not compensable under maintenance and cure framework
  • “[S]eamen have always been accorded the right to bring serial suits to collect maintenance payments as they come due.”
  • “Maintenance and cure are due without regard to the negligence of the employer . . . .”
  • res judicata did not apply to seaman’s suit for maintenance and cure based on the peculiarity of those remedies in admiralty cases
  • maintenance is a per diem living allowance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brown, Krav-Itch, Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.