Glynn Douglas, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Argo-Tech Corporation, Defendant-Appellant/ Cross-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• interpreting the FLSA and Ohio’s Minimum Fair Wage Standards Act “in a unitary fashion” because the statutes parallel each other
• interpreting the FLSA and Ohio laws “in a unitary fashion” because the statutes “parallel[ ]” each other.
• explaining, in the context of overtime claims, that because Ohio’s wage and hour laws “parallel[] the FLSA,” the court approached the issues “in a unitary fashion”
• approving employer’s method of payment where collective bargaining agreement guaranteed employee 40 hours of pay each week, not subject to reduction based on the number of hours employee actually worked
• interpreting both statutes “in a unitary fashion” because they parallel each other
• interpreting both statutes “in a unitary fashion” because they parallel each other

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).