Glue-Fold, Inc. v. Slautterback Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reaching the same result where the undisputed evidence showed that the plaintiff had actual notice of the misappropriation of its trade secret by August of 1995, but failed to file suit until January 1999
• “we think it fair to infer that California law assumes that once a plaintiff knows or should know that a particular defendant cannot be trusted with one secret, it is unreasonable for that plaintiff simply to assume that that defendant can be trusted to protect other secrets”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).