Glow v. Union Pacific Railroad

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• employee suffered disabling pain and his doctor advised him that he should not work with his condition
• “In order to state a violation of the LIA, the plaintiff must show that the complained-of condition created a safety hazard. . . . It is not enough for plaintiff to show that the device or appurtenance did not work properly.”
• FRSA does not preempt the ADA.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).