Skip to main content

Glover v. Commonwealth

Citations

  • 348 S.E.2d 434
  • 3 Va. App. 152
  • 3 Va. Law Rep. 723
  • 1986 Va. App. LEXIS 347

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the trial court as fact finder did not err in assessing the credibility of the witnesses and inferring from their testimony that the defendant knew there was a handgun in a vehicle he had borrowed
  • finding that where the defendant challenged the sufficiency of the evidence showing knowledge of a handgun in a borrowed vehicle, the court may judge the credibility of witnesses and based on their testimony infer that the defendant knew of the presence of the gun
  • finding that where the defendant challenged the sufficiency of the evidence as to his knowledge of a handgun in a borrowed vehicle, the court may judge the credibility of witnesses and based on their testimony infer that the defendant knew of the presence of the gun
  • upholding the search of a car’s passenger compartment under Long where the officer, believing the suspect might be armed, observed him “with his . . . hand in a . . . gym bag” and “removing his hand from the gym bag in a deliberate manner”
  • despite defendant’s offer to stipulate, permitting Commonwealth to prove prior convictions to support conviction under recidivist statute
  • same, where the defendant was “sweating heavily” and “appeared nervous and preoccupied”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cole

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.