Supreme Court of South Carolina· 6/19/1995
GLOVER BY CAUTHEN v. Suitt Const. Co.
Citations
- 458 S.E.2d 535
- 318 S.C. 465
- 1995 S.C. LEXIS 100
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing the South Carolina mortality table may be considered in determining a claimant's life expectancy for the purposes of calculating the present day value of his benefits
- finding section 42-9-10 and 25A S.C.Code Ann. Regs. 67-1207 (1982), when read together, permit the lump sum award of attorney’s fees
- employing agency regulation to aid statutory interpretation where both the regulation and statute evinced the same legislative intent
- employing agency regulation to aid statutory interpretation where both the regulation and statute evinced the same legislative intent
- primary rale of statutory construction requires that legislative intent prevail if it can reasonably be discovered in language used construed in light of intended purpose
- construction of a statute by an agency charged with its administration will be accorded the most respectful consideration and will not be overruled absent compelling reasons
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Waller, Finney, Toal, Moore, Chandler
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Stephen v. Avins Construction Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1996-10-07· cited 81×
- Kiawah Development Partners v. South Carolina Department of Health & Environmental ControlSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2014-12-10· cited 59×
- Carolina Alliance for Fair Employment v. South Carolina Department of Labor, Licensing, & RegulationCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1999-10-25· cited 56×
- Anderson v. Baptist Medical CenterSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-01-16· cited 44×
- City of Camden v. BrassellCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1997-04-21· cited 41×
- Thompson v. South Carolina Steel ErectorsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2006-05-01· cited 23×
- Vulcan Materials Co. v. Greenville County Board of Zoning AppealsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2000-08-07· cited 22×
- Brackenbrook North Charleston, LP v. County of CharlestonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2004-08-16· cited 13×
- Folk v. ThomasSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-03-12· cited 11×
- HAWKINS & GRYPHON, INC. v. Bruno Yacht Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2000-07-31· cited 11×
- South Carolina Department of Transportation v. FaulkenberryCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1999-09-07· cited 8×
- Cox v. BellSouth TelecommunicationsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2003-10-20· cited 6×
- City of Myrtle Beach v. Juel P. Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1999-09-20· cited 5×
- Father v. South Carolina Department of Social ServicesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2001-03-26· cited 5×
- South Carolina Coastal Conservation League v. South Carolina Department of Health & Environmental ControlCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2001-06-18· cited 2×
- Father v. SC DEPT. OF SOCIAL SERVICESCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2001-09-27· cited 1×
- Floyd v. C.B. Askins & Co. ContractorsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2009-03-24· cited 1×
- Sc Coastal Conservation v. Sc DhecCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2001-06-18
- Kiawah Development v. SCDHECSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2014-12-10
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Faile v. South Carolina Employment Security CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1976-11-11· cited 29×
- Corson v. Brown Products, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1980-10-02· cited 12×
- Charleston County School District v. LeathermanCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1988-04-11· cited 3×
- Lail v. RICHLAND WRECKING CO., INC.Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1984-02-27· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.