Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 8/17/2001
Glossip v. State
Citations
- 2001 OK CR 21
- 29 P.3d 597
- 2001 WL 799573
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- theory of defense based on defendant's statements denying knowledge of murder until after its commission warranted instruction in murder trial of lesser-related offense of accessory after the fact
- theory of defense based on defendant's statements denying knowledge of murder until after its commission warranted instruction in murder trial of lesser-related offense of accessory after the fact
- defendant's defense at trial was that he learned of the murder after the fact, failed to tell police what he knew, and assisted the killer \by helping conceal the murder seene\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Johnson, Vice-Presiding, Lile, Lumpkin, Chapel, Strubhar
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- People v. HarlanSupreme Court of Colorado· 2005-03-28· cited 134×
- Easlick v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2004-05-03· cited 91×
- Browning v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2006-04-24· cited 89×
- Glossip v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2007-04-13· cited 68×
- Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2007-07-19· cited 57×
- Andrew v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2007-07-09· cited 56×
- Ball v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2007-11-14· cited 47×
- Miller v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2013-09-06· cited 45×
- Glossip v. OklahomaSupreme Court· 2025-02-25· cited 32×
- Salazar v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2005-12-07· cited 25×
- Grant v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2003-01-24· cited 24×
- FREDERICK v. STATECourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2017-05-25· cited 20×
- Grant v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2004-07-16· cited 15×
- STATE v. TUBBYCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2016-08-03· cited 13×
- NEWMAN v. STATECourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2020-06-04· cited 13×
- Barnett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2012-02-01· cited 6×
- GLOSSIP v. STATECourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2023-04-20· cited 5×
- Scott v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2005-01-28· cited 4×
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2006-09-28· cited 3×
- Glossip v. Oklahoma Revisions: 2/25/25Supreme Court· 2025-02-25
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Cargle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1995-12-22· cited 189×
- Bland v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2000-05-16· cited 158×
- Welch v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2000-05-17· cited 136×
- Young v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2000-10-26· cited 124×
- Shrum v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1999-10-27· cited 123×
- Washington v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1999-05-07· cited 84×
- Childress v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2000-05-22· cited 47×
- Kinsey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1990-09-24· cited 45×
- Bear v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1988-09-02· cited 33×
- Izquierdo-Salas v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2001-01-08· cited 29×
- Ellis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1990-07-13· cited 24×
- Lincoln City Chamber of Commerce v. City of Lincoln CityCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-12-08· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.