Glorioso v. Ness

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming summary judgment in favor of defendant property owner in “trip-and-fall” case where “the evidence [was] legally insufficient to impose premises liability” and it was not “necessary to present [the] issue to a jury”
• court properly granted summary judgment after defendants, in their briefing, enlarged on an argument they had raised in their motion for summary judgment
• fact that no evidence existed of prior injuries caused by a deck step supported the conclusion that the step did not possess conditions necessary to conclude it was unreasonably dangerous
• “A step located in a place where steps normally may be found . . . with no deceptive lighting, not covered with slippery substances, and with no established history of causing injury, does not pose an unreasonable risk of harm.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).