Skip to main content
· 11/7/1994

Gloria Price v. United States Navy Harry Moses Marguerite Moses (Deceased) Michael Moses Shirley Moses

Citations

  • 39 F.3d 1011
  • 30 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 854
  • 25 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20177
  • 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8496
  • 94 Daily Journal DAR 15710
  • 39 ERC (BNA) 1673
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 30934
  • 1994 WL 606102

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding, in the context of a response cost analysis under § 107(a) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9607 (a), that \medical monitoring\ does not fit the definition of \removal\ or \remedial\ action as defined under CERCLA
  • affirming the district court ruling that no imminent and substantial endangerment existed because concrete foundations under plaintiffs’ houses acted as barriers against exposure to lead contamination in soil
  • “A finding of ‘imminency’ does not require 8 a showing that actual harm will occur immediately so long as the risk of threatened harm is present.”
  • “[The] endangerment 2 must be substantial or serious.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nelson, Noonan, King

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.