Gloria Neal v. Secretary of the Department of Veterans Affairs

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that we erred in concluding that state court failed to cure faulty “heinous, atrocious, or cruel” aggravator instruction
• presuming that the state supreme court properly applied 4 the narrowing construction of an aggravating factor even though it did not cite the 5 applicable case
• raising without deciding whether, in light of Ring, an appellate court could cure a vague aggravating factor by applying a narrower construction
• raising without deciding whether, in light of Ring, an appellate court could cure a vague aggravating factor by applying a narrower construction
• declining to address whether the court of appeals correctly held that the petitioner had not defaulted on his claim and citing 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b)(2
• declining to address whether the court of appeals correctly held that the petitioner had not defaulted on his claim and citing 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b)(2

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).