Gloria Maribel Carrillo-Gonzalez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that equitable tolling did not apply to the congressionally- mandated, one-year deadline of the Diversity Immigration Visa Lottery Program for 1997
• finding that an argument by counsel “does not constitute evidence”
• explaining that arguments are not evidence
• “[T]he doctrine of equitable tolling has no application in cases involving the Congressionally-mandated, one-year deadline of the DV Lottery Program.”
• “[Petitioner] forwards th[e] claim [that she was defrauded by a notary] through the argument of her counsel, which does not constitute evidence.”
• “[Petitioner] forwards this claim solely through the argument of her counsel, which does not constitute evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).