Gloria Banks v. James L. Trainor, Etc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that due process requires notice of the individualized factors underlying an adverse determination
• noting that the \income method\ of calculating benefits replaced a method which was based on a percentage of the food allowance for an individual household
• declining to follow the decisions of the Seventh Circuit in Vargas, Dilda, and Banks
• notice must fully explain food stamp calculation “so that members of the class can ascertain whether they are receiving the correct amounts of coupon allotment”
• \Both Goldberg and Vargas require detailed notice of adverse action as a protection against agency error and arbitrariness.\
• \Both Goldberg and Vargas require detailed notice of adverse action as a protection against agency error and arbitrariness.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).