Skip to main content
· 12/2/2016

Gloetzner v. Lynch

Citations

  • 225 F. Supp. 3d 1329
  • 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 166877
  • 2016 WL 7045604

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding OPRA does not require an agency to \gather responsive information and produce new documents\
  • denying a request for \any and all documents and data\ for asking the agency to identify the documents rather than specifically describing the documents sought
  • \A custodian's failure to meet the promised deadline is then deemed a denial.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Conway

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.