· 2/16/1995
Gloeckner v. United States
Citations
- 32 Fed. Cl. 742
- 1995 U.S. Claims LEXIS 32
- 1995 WL 62094
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- an existing final judgment on the merits is conclusive as to all claims which were or might have been litigated in the first lawsuit
- claim preclusion barred movie theater’s subsequent free speech suit after losing on its equal protection suit
- res judicata bars litigation of all claims that were litigated in a prior action
- element met when plaintiff sought essentially the same relief in both actions”
- “It has long been the law of Ohio that ‘an existing final judgment or decree between the parties to litigation is conclusive as to all claims which were or might have been litigated in a first lawsuit.’”
- “It has long been the law of Ohio that an existing final judgment or decree between the parties to litigation is conclusive as to all claims which were or might have been litigated in a first lawsuit.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Yock
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.