Skip to main content

Glod v. Baker

Citations

  • 899 So. 2d 642
  • 2005 WL 665226

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that LUTPA is a peremptive statute because it creates a right and specifies the time in which the right must be exercised, so the continuing violation doctrine does not apply

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thibodeaux

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.