Skip to main content
· 4/30/1907

Globe & Rutgers Fire Ins. v. David Moffat Co.

Citations

  • 154 F. 13
  • 83 C.C.A. 91
  • 1907 U.S. App. LEXIS 4494

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • dismissing suit because plain language of exclusion for “Employment Related Practice” precluded coverage for alleged failure to pay wages and 20 penalties

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eacombe, Townsend, Waeeace

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.