Supreme Court· 10/3/2005
Globe Newspaper Co. v. Ayash
Citations
- 546 U.S. 927
- 163 L. Ed. 2d 275
- 74 U.S.L.W. 3211
- 126 S. Ct. 397
- 2005 U.S. LEXIS 7187
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- remanding for new trial on damages where judge’s instructions and undifferentiated damages award made it impossible to ascertain what damages were awarded for which claim
- c. 151B is “comprehensive statute” and was enacted “to provide judicial and administrative remedies for destructive acts of discrimination in the workplace”
- G. L. c. 151B is “comprehensive statute enacted to provide judicial and administrative remedies for destructive acts of discrimination in the workplace”
- jury could reasonably find that hospital breached implied covenant by failing to abide by its own bylaws in its conduct toward its physicians
- \It cannot be said . . . that claims arising under G. L. c. 151B are causes of action in tort\
- \The scope of the covenant is only as broad as the contract that governs the particular relationship\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
47 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Curtis v. Herb Chambers I-95, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2011-01-18· cited 169×
- T.W. Nickerson, Inc. v. Fleet National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2010-04-16· cited 120×
- Eigerman v. Putnam Investments, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2007-12-20· cited 115×
- Chokel v. Genzyme Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2007-06-04· cited 106×
- Rodgers v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2006-10-26· cited 102×
- Weiler v. PortfolioScope, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2014-07-11· cited 90×
- AFI Holding, Inc. v. BrownNinth Circuit· 2008-06-17· cited 76×
- Robert and Ardis James Foundation v. MeyersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2016-04-21· cited 53×
- Liss v. StudenyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2008-01-23· cited 50×
- Flagg v. AliMed, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2013-07-19· cited 49×
- Okerman v. VA Software Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2007-08-20· cited 48×
- Winchester Gables, Inc. v. Host Marriott Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2007-10-30· cited 42×
- Ozenne v. Bendon (In Re Ozenne)Ninth Circuit· 2006-01-17· cited 38×
- Hutchings v. Ocwen Federal Bank (In Re Hutchings)N.D. Alabama· 2006-09-07· cited 30×
- Rus, Miliband & Smith v. Yoo (In Re Dick Cepek, Inc.)Ninth Circuit· 2006-03-21· cited 28×
- Warfield v. Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2009-07-27· cited 28×
- Dye v. Brown (In Re AFI Holding, Inc.)Ninth Circuit· 2006-10-25· cited 27×
- Cachopa v. Town of StoughtonMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2008-09-15· cited 27×
- Holland v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2005-11-10· cited 23×
- Renzi v. ParedesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2008-07-23· cited 12×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.