Globe Linings, Inc. v. City of Corvallis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the Supreme “Court did not reach our first holding requiring an individualized factual determination of the non-institutionalized spouse’s needs in computing the potentially available funds subject to deeming”
• where one spouse is institutionalized, other spouse receives standard deduction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).