Global Link Logistics, Inc. v. Briles

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding a noncompete covenant to be overbroad and unenforceable where it barred the defendant from “engag[ing] (whether as an owner, operator, manager, employee, officer, director, consultant, advisor, representative or otherwise
• “A non-competition covenant which prohibits an employee from working for a competitor in any capacity, that is, a covenant which fails to specify with particularity the activities which the employee is prohibited from performing, is too broad and indefinite to be enforceable”
• “A non-competition covenant which prohibits an employee from working for a competitor in any capacity, that is, a covenant which fails to specify with particularity the activities which the employee is prohibited from performing, is too broad and indefinite to be enforceable”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).