Skip to main content
· 11/4/2003

Global Index, Inc. v. Mkapa

Citations

  • 290 F. Supp. 2d 108
  • 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19654
  • 2003 WL 22494021

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding, with “no difficulty,” that “Tanzanian promissory notes [are] a commercial activity”
  • noting the D.C. Circuit has not “expressly adopted or rejected the ‘legally significant act’ test,” but instead follows the “more general approach set forth in Weltover”
  • rejecting argument that direct effect existed where “[t]he notes plainly require payment in U.S. dollars to a U.S. company but, on their face, do not designate any place of payment at all, let alone a particular bank or city in the United States”
  • “[I]n almost every case, in this circuit and others, 1 Plaintiff’s other advertising evidence includes a tweet from SBI’s official Twitter account. (Pl.’s Opp’n, Ex. 1, Dkt. No. 46-1.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kennedy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.