Glimp v. Brosch

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming no-disability finding where “[t]he record . . . -4- Case No. 19-1139 Dyson v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec. does not contain a single statement by a treating physician indicating that Long’s health problems result in any specific work-impairing limitations”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).