Glik v. Cunniffe

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that there is a First Amendment interest in videotaping government officials performing their duties in public places
• holding that a private citizen had a First Amendment right to peaceably film police officers performing an arrest in Boston Common
• concluding that “the First Amendment protects the filming of government officials in public spaces,” id. at 83, but “the right to film is not without limitations,” id. at 84
• noting that the right is not without limitations, such as “reasonable time, place, and manner restrictions”
• concluding that “the First Amendment protects the filming 22 PROJECT VERITAS V. SCHMIDT We have also affirmed protection for recording in the context of so-called “ag-gag” laws. In Animal Legal Defense Fund v. Wasden, 878 F.3d 1184 (9th Cir. 2018
• recognizing “that the First Amendment protects the filming of government officials in public spaces”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).