Glidepath Holding B v. v. Spherion Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that reasonable reliance was sufficiently pled to survive a motion to dismiss where the plaintiffs alleged that the defendant \thwarted ... due diligence by misrepresenting information related to [their] requests\
• noting that complaints containing “allegations that one party to a sale had a financial incentive to ‘paint a far rosier financial picture than actually existed in order to induce’ the other party into a sale, such allegations [are] sufficient to survive Rule 9(b)”
• denying a motion to dismiss a fraud claim even if “the inference of fraud raised by the complaint . . . is [only] as strong as any opposing inference”
• “[T]he Court has no obligation to consider an argument for which a party has cited no legal authority.”
• employee does not act outside authority because he “is engaged in fraud upon a third person” (citation omitted)
• plaintiffs adequately pled motive by alleging that defendants sought to avoid paying existing liabilities

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).