Glidden v. Belden

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “unless the affected municipality accepts and constructs the way or files a notice under section 3032(2) ... any incipient rights in the way terminate”
• noting that “the law was intended as a ‘comprehensive attempt to deal with a 13 variety of title and title marketability problems presented by old, proposed, unaccepted streets shown on subdivision plans’” (citing L.D. 1776, Statement of Fact (113th Legis. 1987))
• noting that “the law was intended as a ‘comprehensive attempt to deal with a variety of title and title marketability problems presented by old, proposed, unaccepted streets shown on subdivision plans’ ” (citing L.D. 1776, Statement of Fact (113th Legis. 1987))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).