Skip to main content
· 7/1/2015

Glickert v. Loop Trolley Transportation Development District

Citations

  • 792 F.3d 876
  • 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 11301
  • 2015 WL 4035288

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that plaintiffs lacked standing to assert constitutional voting rights on behalf of others
  • “[T]o preserve the right to amend a complaint a party must submit a proposed amendment along with its motion.” (quoting Wolgin, 722 F.2d at 395)
  • “To satisfy constitutional standing requirements, the plaintiff must make out a ‘case or controversy’ between [itself] and the defendant.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murphy, Shepherd, Brooks

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.