Glick v. Webb

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Incollingo did not establish per se rule that all insurers were required to pay more than pro-rata share of post-judgment interest
• holding that Incollingo did not establish per se rule that all insurers were required to pay more than pro-rata share of post-judgment interest
• CAT fund was not liable for post-judgment interest on entire judgment, but rather was responsible only for interest on its pro rata share of the verdict

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).