Skip to main content
· 5/26/1896

Glick v. Weatherwax

Citations

  • 14 Wash. 560
  • 45 P. 156
  • 1896 Wash. LEXIS 406

Syllabus

<p>EVIDENCE — ADMISSIBILITY OP PAROL — IMMATERIALITY.</p> <p>A question asking a party as to what arrangement he had in relation to getting his pay for certain property is properly excluded where a written contract has already been put in evidence covering the subject.</p> <p>The exclusion of evidence tending to establish a fact essential to the plaintiffs’ recovery is not prejudicial error, where the fact is not disputed.</p>

Judges: Anders, Dunbar, Gordon, Hoyt, Scott

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.