Glenn v. Ashcroft

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the appellate court was required to presume the evidence supported the trial court’s findings regarding the division of marital property in the absence of an evidentiary record
• explaining that “[a] partial evidentiary record would not exclude the possibility that other evidence tilted the balance in favor of the [court’s] findings”
• explaining that “[a] partial evidentiary record would not exclude the possibility that other evidence tilted the balance in favor of the [court’s] findings.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).