Glenn v. Arkansas Best Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reviewing “numerous cases in which a trial court’s decision to limit voir dire has been sustained because the matter sought to be probed by the defendant was too remote from the issues in the case to warrant intrusion into the potential jurors’ private thoughts”
• “The statute does not require that the five subordinates must act in concert at the same time.”
• anonymous jury appropriate when there were allegations of dangerous and unscrupulous conduct and there had been extensive pretrial publicity
• allegations of “dangerous and unscrupulous conduct” and extensive pretrial publicity supported withholding the names and addresses of jurors
• conspiracy to distribute heroin and cocaine and substantive distribution violations as well as engaging in continuing criminal enterprise
• “in a case that generated as much pretrial publicity as this one did and in which allegations of dangerous and unscrupulous conduct abounded,” anonymous jury was appropriate

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).