Glenn Lamar Spradley v. Richard L. Dugger, Robert A. Butterworth, the Attorney General of the State of Florida

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that alleged errors during state postconviction proceedings did not state a claim for habeas relief
• “Neither the state court’s failure to hold a hearing on petitioner’s 3.850 motion or its failure to attach the relevant portions of the record in any way undermines the validity of petitioner’s conviction.”
• “Neither the state court’s failure to hold a hearing on petitioner’s 3.850 motion nor its failure to attach the relevant portions of the record in any way undermines the validity of petitioner’s conviction.”
• argument that the state court failed to attach relevant portions of the record to refute Rule 3.850 motion does not undermine validity of the petitioner’s conviction, and thus, does not state a basis for habeas relief
• argument that the state court failed to attach relevant portions of the record to refute Rule 3.850 motion does not undermine validity of the petitioner’s conviction, and thus does not state a basis for habeas relief
• argument that the state court failed to attach relevant portions of the record to refute Rule 3.850 motion does not undermine validity of the petitioner’s conviction, and thus, does not state a basis for habeas relief

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).