Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that petitioners failed to demonstrate “good cause” for umbrella protective order
• noting that mere abuse of discretion is an inappropriate basis for exercising mandamus jurisdiction where act is discretionary
• observing that a “district court is best situated to determine what factors are relevant” to the dispute
• finding implied waiver where trust company asserted reliance on advice of counsel as an affirmative defense to claim for breach of fiduciary duty
• listing factors to consider in 6 || evaluating whether there is good cause under Rule 26(c)
• discussing mandamus jurisdiction over review of terms of a protective order

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).