Glen Lamar Morning v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the parties agreed that \a deprivation in the form of a shakedown occurred that would likely deter future activity\
• finding that at summary judgment, an inmate could not proceed on his retaliation claim where the defendants established that they did a cell shakedown based on a report of contraband
• finding that at summary judgment, an inmate could not proceed on his retaliation claim where the defendants established that they did a cell shakedown based on a report of contraband
• explaining that once the defendant produces evidence that the deprivation would have occurred regardless of the protected activity, the burden shifts to the plaintiff to demonstrate that the stated reason was pretextual
• explaining circumstantial evidence may establish a causal link between the protected activity and adverse action
• explaining circumstantial evidence may establish a causal link between the protected activity and adverse action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).