Gleason v. Zocco

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that granting a motion to disqualify “immediately after the action was commenced” would make “prejudice to plaintiff of having to change counsel ... insignificant”
• disqualifying counsel because of his “extensive personal involvement in every aspect of the underlying controversies”
• granting motion to disqualify counsel where he was personally involved in “every aspect of the underlying controversies that led to this lawsuit,” and his “unique personal interest in this case presents an endless parade of likely conflicts of interest”
• appearance of impropriety “usually insufficient to disqualify an attorney” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).