· 10/27/1967
Gleason v. Almac's, Inc.
Citations
- 234 A.2d 350
- 103 R.I. 40
- 1967 R.I. LEXIS 573
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that there was insufficient evidence that the role of film in which plaintiff slipped and fell was present due to the defendant's negligence or that defendant had actual or constructive notice of its presence
- trial justice improperly denied judgment in defendant’s favor because there was insufficient evidence that store had notice of roll of film on floor and no testimony about store policy on maintaining a safe condition for customers
- trial justice improperly denied judgment in defendant's favor because there was insufficient evidence that store had notice of roll of film on floor and no testimony about store policy on maintaining a safe condition for customers
- in which the plaintiff failed to show the defendant’s negligence or notice to the defendant of the roll of film on the floor on which the plaintiff had stepped, causing her to slip and fall
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Roberts, Paolino, Powers, Joslin, Kelleher
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.