Gleasman v. Jones (In Re Gleasman)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• acknowledging that court may depart from the usual requirement of a full supersedeas bond
• including potential diminution in value of the real property and the time value of the property in calculating amount of bond
• staying foreclosure order pending debtor’s appeal of adversary which underlay such order
• “The court rejects Franklin’s contention that a bond equal to the stipulated value of the property is required. The purpose of a bond, after all, is to protect Franklin against loss, not to confer a windfall”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).