Glazer v. Formica Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that district court had inappropriately found leveraged buyout negotiations immaterial as a matter of law when the parties had engaged in substantive meetings regarding the possibility of a leveraged buyout and had begun due diligence
• holding that district court had inappropriately found leveraged buyout negotiations immaterial as a matter of law when the parties had engaged in substantive meetings regarding the possibility of a leveraged buyout and had begun due diligence
• \The mere fact that a company has received an acquisition overture or that some discussion has occurred will not necessarily be material.\
• no misrepresentation where company said both that the best thing would be for it to remain independent, and that it would consider any legitimate proposal to acquire the company
• failure to disclose initial proceedings in management-led leveraged buyout does not violate Rule 10b-5 where company had previously announced its intent to consider any legitimate proposal to acquire company

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

81 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• San Leandro Emergency Medical Group Profit Sharing Plan v. Philip Morris Companies, Inc.
  Second Circuit· 1996-01-25· cited 563×
• In Re Time Warner Inc. Securities Litigation
  Second Circuit· 1993-11-30· cited 541×
• Unnamed case
  Third Circuit· 2000-09-07· cited 370×
• In Re Morgan Stanley Information Fund Securities
  Second Circuit· 2010-01-25· cited 364×
• Stratte-McClure v. Stanley
  Second Circuit· 2015-01-12· cited 219×
• In Re Initial Public Offering Securities Litigation
  S.D. New York· 2003-02-19· cited 193×
• United States v. Schiff
  Third Circuit· 2010-04-07· cited 171×
• Castellano v. Young & Rubicam, Inc.
  Second Circuit· 2001-07-19· cited 152×
• Ganino v. Citizens Utilities Co.
  Second Circuit· 2000-09-06· cited 119×
• In Re Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. Securities Litigation
  S.D. New York· 2006-07-20· cited 103×
• Federal Housing Finance Agency v. Nomura Holding America, Inc.
  Second Circuit· 2017-09-28· cited 98×
• Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,222 William M. McCormick v. The Fund American Companies, Inc., a Delaware Corporation
  Ninth Circuit· 1994-05-20· cited 93×
• Ganino v. Citizens Utilities Co.
  Second Circuit· 2000-09-11· cited 93×
• Employees' Retirement System v. Williams Companies
  Tenth Circuit· 2018-05-11· cited 92×
• In Re Take-Two Interactive Securities Litigation
  S.D. New York· 2008-04-16· cited 91×
• In Re Bristol Myers Squibb Co. Securities Litigation
  S.D. New York· 2008-08-20· cited 83×
• Noto v. 22nd Century Grp.
  Second Circuit· 2022-05-24· cited 77×
• In Re eSpeed, Inc. Securities Litigation
  S.D. New York· 2006-04-03· cited 72×
• In Re Lehman Bros. Securities and Erisa Litigation
  S.D. New York· 2011-07-27· cited 66×
• In Re Keyspan Corp. Securities Litigation
  E.D. New York· 2003-03-21· cited 61×