Glaze v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• weighing Mathews factors and concluding that indigent parent has federal due process and state constitutional right under article first, § 10, to appointed counsel in state supported paternity action
• applying Eldridge factors in concluding there is a constitutional right to appointment of counsel for any indigent putative father in paternity cases without the necessity for a case by case assessment
• indigent defendants in state-supported paternity actions have a right, under both the federal and state constitutions, to court-appointed counsel at state expense
• general rule applied to paternity actions despite their “ ‘quasicriminar overtones”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).