Glaz v. Ralston Purina Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• judge properly disregarded deposition excerpts that were conclusory in nature and based on hearsay
• claim exists where employee can “point to some clearly-defined and well-established public policy that is threatened by the employer’s action . . . [such as] termination ... in retaliation for performing an important and socially desirable act . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).