Glave v. Michigan Terminix Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that ferae naturae precluded plaintiffs claim that city should be liable for driving pigeons into her neighborhood, where city took no steps to tame, confine, or to otherwise control pigeons
• asserting that “the trial court did not err by determining as a matter of law that the pigeons were wild”
• upholding defendant’s summary judgment on plaintiffs negligence claim by holding that ferae naturae prevented city from being liable for driving pigeons into her neighborhood, where city took no steps to tame, confine, or to otherwise control pigeons
• upholding defendant’s summary judgment and holding that ferae naturae precluded city’s liablity for driving pigeons into -8- 04-17-00410-CV plaintiff’s neighborhood, where city took no steps to tame, confine, or to otherwise control pigeons
• Under the doctrine of animals ferae naturae, where the defendants never tamed, confined or otherwise controlled the animals, but in fact encouraged their departure, the defendants were not the keepers of the animals.
• Under the doctrine of animals ferae naturae, where the defendants never tamed, confined or otherwise controlled the animals, but in fact encouraged their departure, the defendants were not the keepers of the animals.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).