Glaus v. Anderson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that filing a § 2241 challenge to a condition of confinement was improper
• holding that filing a § 2241 challenge to a condition of confinement was improper
• holding that a prisoner's request to be transferred to a prison facility that could give him proper medical treatment for Hepatitis C was inappropriate under a habeas petition because it was a conditions-of-confinement claim
• concluding that because “release from custody is not an option” for a claim that alleges that “medical treatment amounts to cruel and unusual punishment” in violation of the Eighth Amendment, it cannot be addressed in habeas
• concluding that because “release from custody is not an option” for a claim that alleges that “medical treatment amounts to cruel and unusual punishment” in violation of the Eighth Amendment, it cannot be addressed in habeas
• concluding that because “release from custody is not an option” for a claim that alleges that “medical treatment amounts to cruel and unusual punishment” in violation of the Eighth Amendment, it cannot be addressed in habeas

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).