Glaudel v. Hiatt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “it is for the court to decide as a matter of law whether certain statements alleged to be defamatory are actionable or not.”
• holding that “it is for the court to decide as a matter of law whether certain statements alleged to be defamatory are actionable or not.”
• holding that liability for intentional infliction of emotional distress “ ‘clearly does not extend to mere insults, indignities, threats, annoyances, petty oppressions, or other trivialities.’ ”
• stating that the facts of the case did not incline it to adopt the tort
• stating that the facts of the case did not incline it to adopt the tort
• recognizing validity of cause of action for intentional infliction of emotional distress

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).