Skip to main content
· 10/19/1888

Glaubensklee v. Low

Citations

  • 29 Ill. App. 408
  • 1888 Ill. App. LEXIS 145

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the “duty to defend . . . is triggered . . . notwithstanding the possibility that the underlying claim may ultimately fail or that the merits of the claim are weak of frivolous”
  • “[W]e need not reach the issues raised by the parties related to recoupment of monies paid for defending Vibram under a reservation of rights.”
  • noting contract interpretation should mind the insured’s “objectively reasonable” expectations
  • “[t]he use of another’s advertising idea in your ‘advertisement.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gjreen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.