Glasser v. Youth Shop

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding injury did not arise out of employment because claimant “was not on the stairs because of his employment; he would have been there in any event, regardless of whether he had brought his work home”
• finding injury did not arise out of employment because claimant “was not on the stairs because of his employment; he would have been there in any event, regardless of whether he had brought his work home”
• “Since industry must carry the burden, there must then be some causal connection between the employment and the injury, or it must have had its origin in some risk incident to or connected with the employment, or have followed from it as a natural consequence.”
• “Since industry must carry the burden, there must then be some causal connection between the employment and the injury, or it must have had its origin in some risk incident to or connected with the employment, or have followed from it as a natural consequence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).