Glass v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing claims against the United States pursuant to the derivative jurisdiction doctrine, and remanding 7 claims against the remaining parties to state court
• dismissing counterclaim under derivative jurisdiction doctrine and remanding the remaining claims to state court
• discussing 1986 and 2002 amendments to the removal statutes, concluding that Congress appeared to have abolished the derivative jurisdiction doctrine in 1986 with 28 U.S.C. § 1441(f), but clarified in 2002 that it was only abolished for removals under § 1441
• “the 26 doctrine of ‘derivative jurisdiction,’ if applicable here, would preclude this Court from having 27 jurisdiction, even if the matter could have been raised here originally”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).