Glass v. Minnesota Protective Life Insurance Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that agent had fully performed oral contract entitling him to renewal commissions, even though commissions were not owed until policy holders paid their premiums
• denying an insurance company’s motion to dismiss because the court could “not say that no state of facts is conceivable under which plaintiff might prove a right to recover renewal commissions from defendant on a theory of unjust enrichment.”
• “A renunciation authorizes but does not require the nondefaulting party to treat the contract as broken.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).